Prediction markets have experienced rapid growth as investors, cryptocurrency enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals seek novel ways to engage with the financial markets. Platforms like Kalshi have popularized a unique form of trading, enabling participants to buy and sell contracts based on the probability of specific future outcomes.
While initial interest centered on the mechanics of these platforms, a more critical challenge is emerging: the tax implications. Recent legislative actions indicate that regulatory frameworks are evolving quickly, making it essential for active traders to understand how these transactions are treated for tax purposes.
Unlike traditional stock or mutual fund investments, prediction markets involve purchasing contracts tied to the occurrence of specific future events. These markets often resolve questions such as:
Although these platforms share superficial similarities with sports wagering, they are legally distinct. Many prediction markets operate under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which regulates these event contracts as financial products rather than traditional gambling instruments.
North Carolina recently enacted legislation that imposes a 6% tax on the net trading fee revenue earned by prediction-market operators within the state, alongside an increase in the state's sports wagering tax. While this does not impose a direct state tax on individual trading activity, its implications are significant.
By taxing operators separately from traditional sports wagering, North Carolina has recognized federally regulated prediction markets as a distinct financial category. This statutory recognition suggests that state governments are beginning to treat prediction markets as a unique asset class, which typically precedes more comprehensive tax guidance for individual participants.

At the federal level, the CFTC has consistently asserted that event-contract markets fall within its regulatory jurisdiction rather than under state gambling laws. The agency has actively defended this position in litigation involving state-level regulatory efforts.
While these legal disputes primarily impact exchange operators, they reinforce the status of prediction markets as a permanent, regulated segment of the financial system. As this recognition solidifies, additional federal tax guidance and formal reporting requirements are expected to emerge.
Because the IRS has not yet issued definitive guidance addressing prediction market transactions, tax professionals must analyze several potential reporting frameworks based on existing law.
Under this approach, net winnings would be taxed as ordinary income at the taxpayer's marginal tax rate. However, deducting losses under this framework is highly restrictive: gambling losses are generally only deductible if the taxpayer itemizes, and current law limits the deduction to 90% of those losses. This limitation can result in taxable income even if a trader broke even economically over the tax year.
If contracts are treated as capital assets, gains and losses would be reported similarly to traditional property transactions on Form 8949. Net capital losses could offset capital gains, with up to $3,000 of remaining losses offsetting ordinary income annually.
For contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets, some transactions might qualify for treatment under Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code. This classification provides a highly favorable tax split, where 60% of gains are treated as long-term capital gains and 40% as short-term capital gains, regardless of how long the contract was held.
In the absence of clear IRS guidance, many tax professionals advise taking a conservative reporting position. Treating winnings as ordinary income is often the most audit-resistant approach because it applies the least favorable tax treatment. While this may mean paying more tax initially, it significantly lowers the risk of underreporting penalties and interest charges.
If the IRS subsequently issues favorable guidance, taxpayers generally have three years from the filing date of the original return, or two years from the date the tax was paid (whichever is later), to file an amended return and claim a refund.
As these platforms grow in popularity, active traders must address critical planning questions before tax season arrives, rather than waiting for their tax organizers to arrive. Important considerations include:
Investors familiar with digital assets have witnessed this regulatory pattern before. During the early years of cryptocurrency, formal tax guidance was sparse, and many assumed the IRS would not focus on digital assets. However, the IRS subsequently escalated enforcement, updated tax forms, and introduced strict disclosure rules.
While prediction markets differ from cryptocurrency, both represent emerging financial instruments that developed faster than the tax code. Similar increases in IRS scrutiny and reporting requirements are highly likely as these markets mature.
Robust documentation is the best defense against regulatory uncertainty. If you actively trade event contracts, you should maintain meticulous records of the following:
Organized records simplify tax preparation, support your positions in the event of an audit, and help identify tax-planning opportunities throughout the year.
North Carolina's legislation is likely the beginning of a broader state-level trend. As prediction markets expand, other states will evaluate how to tax operator revenue and classify these transactions within their existing tax frameworks.
While some states may follow North Carolina's lead by taxing operators while acknowledging CFTC oversight, others may adopt more aggressive regulatory stances or defer action until additional federal guidance is released.
Evaluating your trading activity prior to the end of the tax year is essential. With multiple potential tax treatments and no definitive IRS guidelines, choosing a defensible reporting position and maintaining clear documentation is critical. A proactive review allows you to analyze tax positions under current law and prepare for future regulatory changes before planning opportunities are lost.
Prediction markets are transitioning from a niche financial product to a recognized, regulated asset class. While North Carolina's new law targets operator revenue rather than individual traders, it signals a broader shift toward formal state and federal taxation frameworks.
As these rules continue to evolve, proactive tax planning is vital to avoid compliance surprises. If you are actively trading prediction contracts, let's connect to review your activity, evaluate your reporting options, and establish a compliant, strategic approach for your tax return.
Sign up for our newsletter.